I just fooled around my camera shop today with the 14-24 from ... the dark side (: . One of the few temptations of "the other brand" (: , but a really powerful one (:. Superb lens, but the simple FL difference from 14 to 16 was not worth 2000 USD for me (at the moment). The only strong point that the 14L still has for me is superior correction and resolution against my 16-35 mk2 but ... I don't think that would make such a tremendous difference in my photography , at the moment. Channeling those funds towards a 200 2 IS might .... (:.
clausjepsen wrote:
Thaks. My problem with 16-35 is the distorsion. If you accidently place a person close to the edge, then their head get enormous. I have heard that the 14 mm should be better.
Who told you that? Did it make sense to you at the time? Does it make sense if you think about it?
