JimBuchanan Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
I hesitated putting this post back up, so as not to discuss sharpness, again. My point was the reason for the color shift between the 2 lenses. I couldn't believe I was comparing 2 lenses and forgot to remove a skylight filter. Well, turned out there were no filters on either lens, rather high refractive, radioactive glass in the 58.
Also, I never said the 58/1.2 wasn't sharp wide open. I demonstrated the MC 50/1.4 was sharper at every aperture from f/1.4 on and across the field, in a comparative study of 100% crops.
In a more practical setting, and especially without comparison, any difference between the 2 will not be noticed.
I use a Rokkor 58/1.2, also, and really appreciate having it. For some reason, the OOF specular highlights are larger and more diffuse than a f/1.4 or f/2.0 50mm lens at the same f/stop (say f/2.0 & f/2.8), not to mention f/1.2. And, herein lies the point, the apparent sharpness is much greater with the 58/1.2, because of the speed and probably the extra 8mm focal length.
The Rokkor 58/1.2 is a very fine lens.
|