 |
brainiac Offline [X]
|
p.1 #7 · p.1 #7 · CZ 24-85N VarioSonnar vs CZ 35-70 on CanonMM | |
Silentlight wrote:
Curious to know how the CZ 24-85 compares to EF 24-105 L. Sharpness, contrast and light falloff on the corners. The price of 24-85N plus conversion is close to that of buying a 24-105L.
Has anybody done this comparison?
This has been answered before, if you search the forum.
My experience was that the two lenses were practically indistinguishable at the wide end, except for the Canon's greater distortion, which was predictable since it has a longer range. The Contax is unusually well corrected for distortion at 24mm. At 35mm I really couldn't tell the difference. However, once you get to 70mm and above, the Canon seems to lack 3D effect, whereas the Contax, while not razor sharp, still has a lifelike punchy look. Both lenses will give visible CA on a 5D and better.
Now that DPP does distortion and CA correction, the Canon has a serious advantage, and right now I would choose it over the Contax because of that and IS. Before DPP offered distortion, CA, and fall-off correction, the reason I went with the Contax is that it is a much shorter lens at 24mm and hangs nicely over the shoulder, whereas the 24-105 is a bit like the 24-70L, a big long ugly burden which swings around hurting people and muttering "steal me".
Edited on Aug 26, 2008 at 06:59 AM
|
| Aug 26, 2008 at 06:55 AM |
| |
|
 |