hubsand Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Absolutely. First impressions (and I can feel Frank about to join in here) are that it's 'differently forgiving' from the 5D. The Canon chips are inherently better engineered to dampen noise.
With the 5D, up to ISO400, I'm used to pushing shadows and midtones as much as two stops in post production before noise becomes an issue. Try doing that with the ZD and you'll be looking at chroma noise so ghastly it would be ruinous at web-res. At ISO 50-100 I can push it maybe 1.5 stops before noise becomes troublesome enough to need blurring away by LR's noise reduction. You do not want to try the same trick with a ZD back at ISO 200. However, at ISO 100 the files look much more robust than the ZD body samples I've seen.
In general shooting, I'm planning on keeping +2/3 of a stop permanently dialled in by by default. Again, I don't know whether the Mark II has better metering, but my Mark I is prone to underexpose in all the situations you'd expect it to do so. The camera is so slow anyway – in light and speed terms – another second on the shutter hardly seems to matter!
|