fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

  

Archive 2005 · had to get rid of my 28-70, so...

  
 
1fstwrx
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · had to get rid of my 28-70, so...


I think I can get by for half the price for a while. I need something, so 24-85 3.5-4.5, sb600 since I can't have 2.8, and a 50 1.8. I think these will all suffice until I can afford another 28-70 2.8. Any reason I shouldn't go with these, or should pick a different kit to get by for now...


Oct 01, 2005 at 02:03 AM
Fundy
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · had to get rid of my 28-70, so...


Well what do you shoot? Why did you get rid of the 2.8?

You'll just lose money by buying something to get by in the mean time.

If you want advice you need to give is more info. A used 24-85 is a pretty dang good lens, probably the best cheap substitute for a 28-70 2.8, unless you can get by with less range with a 35-70 2.8.

Andrew



Oct 01, 2005 at 02:33 AM
chemprof
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #3 · had to get rid of my 28-70, so...




I would never get rid of my 24-85 for a 28-70. 28-70 is not wide enough and way to heavy! Be happy with your choice!

Gerald



Oct 01, 2005 at 07:13 AM
johnnymg
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #4 · had to get rid of my 28-70, so...


1fstwrx wrote:
I think I can get by for half the price for a while. I need something, so 24-85 3.5-4.5, sb600 since I can't have 2.8, and a 50 1.8. I think these will all suffice until I can afford another 28-70 2.8. Any reason I shouldn't go with these, or should pick a different kit to get by for now...


The 24-85 is an excellent lens. They go for around $225 on the used market. The kit lens is also a good lens. Many people compare these two lens as "equals" in terms of pic quality. However, (for my copies) I think my 24-85 is the slightly better lens in terms of sharpness and contrast.

JohmG



Oct 01, 2005 at 07:27 AM
Jack OBrien
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #5 · had to get rid of my 28-70, so...


24-85 is a much more versatile lens than the 28-70, plus it's light weight, has an ED element, and it's sharp. The proof is in the picture

Jack



Oct 01, 2005 at 07:35 AM
genghis45
Offline
• • • • •
[X]
p.1 #6 · had to get rid of my 28-70, so...


24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G Zoom-Nikkor.....

Scott

Picture Title:

"Marilyn's Demons"




Oct 01, 2005 at 07:42 AM
genghis45
Offline
• • • • •
[X]
p.1 #7 · had to get rid of my 28-70, so...


More 24-85mm Zoom-Nikkor....

Scott

"Picture Title

"Hic Town"



Oct 01, 2005 at 07:44 AM
genghis45
Offline
• • • • •
[X]
p.1 #8 · had to get rid of my 28-70, so...


Final 24-85mm....

Scott

Picture Title:

"Nine To Five With Thanks"



Oct 01, 2005 at 07:46 AM
jmcfadden
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #9 · had to get rid of my 28-70, so...


Jack

I have both right now

The 28-70 is heavy but there is no substitute for mass and quality and also Speed.

This lens has no peers really , i stands alone . I like my 24-85 a lot and it is close second, but the big honking zoomer she is something else
'



J



Oct 01, 2005 at 07:48 AM
Jack OBrien
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #10 · had to get rid of my 28-70, so...


jmcfadden wrote:
Jack

I have both right now

The 28-70 is heavy but there is no substitute for mass and quality and also Speed.

This lens has no peers really , i stands alone . I like my 24-85 a lot and it is close second, but the big honking zoomer she is something else
'

J


I've got too much mass to carry around I really like the wide end of the 24-85, it would be untouchable if it were f/2.8. I've really enjoyed this lens for portrait work too.

Jack



Oct 01, 2005 at 07:56 AM
genghis45
Offline
• • • • •
[X]
p.1 #11 · had to get rid of my 28-70, so...


jacko wrote:
:D I've got too much mass to carry around LOL I really like the wide end of the 24-85, it would be untouchable if it were f/2.8. I've really enjoyed this lens for portrait work too.

Jack


********************************************************

I like its portraiture attributes, too.

:-)

Scott



Oct 01, 2005 at 08:04 AM
Jack OBrien
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #12 · had to get rid of my 28-70, so...


genghis45 wrote:
********************************************************

I like its portraiture attributes, too.

:-)

Scott


Just a 'slightly' different style of portrait
http://www.jackobrienphoto.com/images/fm/09302005/_DSC00278x10Web.jpg

Jack



Oct 01, 2005 at 08:07 AM
genghis45
Offline
• • • • •
[X]
p.1 #13 · had to get rid of my 28-70, so...


jacko wrote:
Just a 'slightly' different style of portrait :D

Jack


*********************************************************

What? These are NYC college senior pics....

:-)

Scott



Oct 01, 2005 at 08:10 AM
jefflee
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #14 · had to get rid of my 28-70, so...


Hi:

I have the 24-85 D f2.8-4 Macro. Love this lens, and KEH has a supply of used ones between 300-400 dollars (No affiliation, just bought stuff from and got great service). I find this lens a fast focuser and sharp (see Bjorn's site for a review).

Also the Macro really works with this lens making it versitle:

http://www.marketmagic.com/weeklyweb/fly.jpg

The lens is a 72mm, but it is now my normal lens. I find it edge to edge just as sharp as my 12-24, 80-200 f2.8, 300 AFS f4.

Just an option.



Oct 01, 2005 at 11:28 AM
1fstwrx
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #15 · had to get rid of my 28-70, so...


genghis45 wrote:
24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G Zoom-Nikkor.....

Scott

Picture Title:

"Marilyn's Demons"



Alright guys, thanks for the encouragement, gonna go ahead and pick up a used one from keh.com and save some dough over the new one.

Scott, I have seen a lot of your work, but never this shot. I don't know what it is, but I keep coming back to it. Great work man!



Oct 01, 2005 at 11:36 AM





FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account