I thought I wasn't interested in the 5D. I thought the lack of weathersealing was a big dealbreaker on a $3k+ camera for me. I thought maybe the buffer is going to seem so slow next to my 1D2. I thought I hated that tiny obnoxious focus point selector pad.
Thanks for the mini-review. Images look good. ...But is that vignetting in the graveyard picture? Probably just a shadow... anyway, wish I had loads of money :-) congrats on your new camera.
hauxon wrote:
Thanks for the mini-review. Images look good. ...But is that vignetting in the graveyard picture? Probably just a shadow... anyway, wish I had loads of money :-) congrats on your new camera.
I was wondering the same thing, i attributed it to the wide aperture. Does the camera show vignetting , if so at what apertures/ focal lengths?
On that last picture....On the upper left in the sky...is that dust on the sensor already?!?! I hope not.
Great review and I am actually waiting on mine right now. I think that this camera teamed up with a 20D lets you have best of both worlds for close to the price of a new 1Dmk2N
argonaut wrote:
I assume to use the raw + L jpg at 3fps one needs the Sandisk extreme III cards??
I think you'll be able to do this with any CF card. All the images goes first to the buffer. Not sure tough if camera is able to write off buffer at the same time as you take pictures, as there was mention in manual with lower image quality settings you could drive contiunous shots until your CF is full.
I myself use Kingston Elite Pro memory cards, and they run perfectly witi 5D.
Rob Eckert wrote:
Wow fancy that, someone who gets one of the hottest new cameras, AND posts some shots taken with the camera. Thanks for your efforts.
Rob
You're all welcome To make the review was one of the reasons why I was so anxious to have this camera so soon But also because there's few jobs coming where huge prints are an advantage. (marketing pictures for a company)..
hauxon wrote:
Thanks for the mini-review. Images look good. ...But is that vignetting in the graveyard picture? Probably just a shadow... anyway, wish I had loads of money :-) congrats on your new camera.
Yes, the 35L lens vignets full open (f/1.4). I just shot some test pictures - the image looks almost clear from f/2.0 and above (judging from camera's LCD screen). Well - this could also be good thing for some artistic photos
Edited by Arhi Esansaari on Sep 28, 2005 at 09:05 AM GMT
cmalana wrote:
On that last picture....On the upper left in the sky...is that dust on the sensor already?!?! I hope not.
Yes, that's dust. And it was shot with the first lens I ever fitted to the camera. And I made sure everything with the lens was clean. Maybe Canon doesn't assemble these in clean envrioment.
It would have been nice however, if one would not need to clean his/her sensor right away after opening the box.
Arhi Esansaari wrote:
Yes, the 35L lens vignets full open (f/1.4). I just shot some test pictures - the image looks almost clear from f/2.0 and above (judging from camera's LCD screen). Well - this could also be good thing for some artistic photos
Well that's bad news for everyone looking forward to get a FF camera to get the most of their all mighty 35L! Wonder if vignetting is going to be a problem with most lenses on a FF when wide open. Vignetting has almost been a non-issue for the 1.6x and 1.3 cameras. If that's the case going FF is just making you use tha bad areas of you glass.
> Well that's bad news for everyone looking forward to get a FF camera to get the most of their all mighty 35L!
It's funny this is mentioned, considering the complaints and knocks on the the Sigma 30 1.4 and 18-50 2.8 vignetting wide open. It happens, deal with it!
Thanks for the review -- considering prices in Finland (although much cheaper than Sweden or Norway) you got a good price for that 5D.
I assume you have to process the pics (RAW) with Canon software at the moment as CS2 hasn't (as yet) got RAW conversion.
Has the DPP improved compared with the previous version -- . It might be a while (but hopefully not) before Adobe has an update for the CS2 RAW conversion.
mjemirzian wrote:
> Well that's bad news for everyone looking forward to get a FF camera to get the most of their all mighty 35L!
It's funny this is mentioned, considering the complaints and knocks on the the Sigma 30 1.4 and 18-50 2.8 vignetting wide open. It happens, deal with it!
35L still performs well when stopped down a little. Or one could shoot graveyard pics full open and have some extra horror tune to pictures with vignetting
Kyle Yates wrote:
Thanks for the review -- considering prices in Finland (although much cheaper than Sweden or Norway) you got a good price for that 5D.
I assume you have to process the pics (RAW) with Canon software at the moment as CS2 hasn't (as yet) got RAW conversion.
Has the DPP improved compared with the previous version -- . It might be a while (but hopefully not) before Adobe has an update for the CS2 RAW conversion.
Kyle,
My 5D has a country of origin UK. Just has scandinavian manuals in it.
I haven't used RAW converters yet. Don't want to install Canon softwares, so I have usede RAW+Fine L setting in the camera. Have run JPEG through PS while waiting for C1 to come up with support for this camera. Because of this, I'm sorry I don't know about DPP.
mjemirzian wrote:
> Well that's bad news for everyone looking forward to get a FF camera to get the most of their all mighty 35L!
It's funny this is mentioned, considering the complaints and knocks on the the Sigma 30 1.4 and 18-50 2.8 vignetting wide open. It happens, deal with it!
Why should we have to? If I am going to spend the money for a fast wide I personally would like it to work properly. If I have to stop it down why do I need it fast? Isn't one of the main attractions of FF the welcomed return of having lenses behave the way they did on 35mm film bodies? Well, if Canon's lenses had performed liked this on film every reviewer would have killed them and they would be lucky to Fuji's share of the DSLR market today. This is a 35mm lens for goodness sake, not an ultra-wide.
As long as people are so willing to accept poor performance from their lenses (and vignetting qualifies) Canon has no reason to correct the problem.
ward1066 wrote:
Is it just the 35mm or do other lenses faster than 2.8 vignette on FF?
The problem is limited to wide angle lenses, and has nothing to do with aperture as such. However, stopping down reduces vignetting when it is present.
Further: It is important to realize that those lenses who vignette on Full Frame sensors also vignette when used on a film body. My EF 20mm 2.8 USM shows severe vignetting both on the FF digital sensor of an 1Ds II and film when I use the EOS 5 film body. The Zeiss Distagon 21mm 2.8 shows very little vignetting on both. If Zeiss can make a good wide angle, Canon can if they truly set their minds to it.
The Zeiss example demonstrates that it is not the sensor size (or film size for that matter) in itself that is at fault. Therefore, the solution to the vignetting is to make better optics - and this has always been the case.
bogatyr wrote:
The problem is limited to wide angle lenses, and has nothing to do with aperture as such. However, stopping down reduces vignetting when it is present.
Further: It is important to realize that those lenses who vignette on Full Frame sensors also vignette when used on a film body. My EF 20mm 2.8 USM shows severe vignetting both on the FF digital sensor of an 1Ds II and film when I use the EOS 5 film body. The Zeiss Distagon 21mm 2.8 shows very little vignetting on both. If Zeiss can make a good wide angle, Canon can if they truly set their minds to it.
The Zeiss example demonstrates that it is not the sensor size (or film size for that matter) in itself that is at fault. Therefore, the solution to the vignetting is to make better optics - and this has always been the case.
Quite true and I hope no one took my comments as a slight on the 5D. The reality is that we buy into a system and that system is only as good as its weakest components. If we have a great FF body it shouldn't be saddled with lenses that don't allow it to fulfill its potential. Yes, we can buy Zeiss optics but doing so eliminates the value of Canon's excellent AF system nad that is a big time loss for many. Sure we can deal with it but as long as we do Canon has no vested interest (loss of income) in correcting a major system flaw.
To make the review was one of the reasons why I was so anxious to have this camera so soon 
