nmerc_photos Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
snegron7 wrote:
I agree with you 110%! My thought process was very similar when I started this thread. Here's what led me to my decision to ask about what gear to take:
I'll be going to Iceland with a family member. This family member does not have a camera, so my plan is to let that family member borrow one of mine. So, from the 3 cameras I currently have (Canon R6II, Sony A7c, OM System OM-5), one of them will be going with my family member. I get to take the other 2.
I like the idea of shooting with either of my full frame cameras (R6II and A7c), however, my tiny OM-5 produces amazing images that are very close to my full frame images (it beats out any APS-C camera I have ever owned). There is a 99% chance that the OM-5 will be one of the two cameras that I take with me. The jury is still out between either the R6II or the A7c.
My Olympus 7-14mm f2.8 Pro lens on my OM-5 is incredibly bright and sharp, so no regrets taking it with me. However, that leaves me with the other 2 cameras I own; R6II and A7c.
My Canon lenses are not the greatest. If I can't count on my RF 16mm f2.8 STM to capture the Northern Lights, then I have to consider a faster/better wide angle lens. The RF 15-35mm f2.8L has been on my radar, but I have read several reviews and posts complaining about how bad it performs for astrophotography. In addition to high levels of vignetting, comma seems to be an issue as well. That bugs me because for a $2000 "L" series lens, this lens should be near perfect. Native RF mount, fast/wide lenses are not that abundant, so I would have to look into a 3rd part EF mount lens to use with an EF/RF adapter.
As for Sony, there are options (Sony 14mm f1.8 GM), however, I am leaning heavily toward letting my family member use my Sony A7c. I think there's a pretty good chance my family member can use my Tamron 17-28mm f2.8 to capture shots of the Northern Lights. On a side note, I owned (and returned) a Viltrox AF 16mm f1.8 for use with my A7c. The lens failed me while on an overseas trip. The faulty electronics froze up my A7c.
So, I'm tossing around several ideas and options which led me to post my original question. Should I get the Sony 14mm f1.8 GM and let my family member use my R6II with RF 16mm f2.8 STM? Should I instead bite the ($2000+) bullet and get the Canon RF 15-35mm f2.8L and let my family member use my Sony A7c with Tamron 17-28mm f2.8? Will what I currently own suffice for this trip leaving me with extra cash to spend?
P.S. Regardless of whatever path I go with, the OM-5 with 7-14mm f2.8 Pro stays with me for this trip. ...Show more →
Having owned the RF 15-35 f2.8, I would not buy it if my main intent was Aurora in Iceland. There are far cheaper and far better lenses out there.
Have a look at the Rokinon 24mm f1.4 and 12mm f2.8 that I mentioned before. You could buy 10 of them for the same price as a single RF 15-35.
If you have other areas where you think the 15-35 f2.8 will shine - then sure.
The Sony 14mm f1.8 is one of the best lenses I've ever used (and I've owned just about every mirrorless lens from both Nikon/Canon, and many Sony ones). It's my go-to travel Aurora lens. The Sigma 14mm f1.4 is better in just about every optical way - but is is significantly larger, heavier, and more expensive.
if you're planning on letting the family member use the Sony, I'd pick up one of the cheap Rokinons for them. and then use the OM5 with your 7-14 for yourself. I expect the Sony + Rokinon will produce better images, but they should be fairly close.
|