chiron Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
p.3 #5 · p.3 #5 · Anyone use a 2 body set up for non professional non event work (hiking, travel, etc) | |
Viramati wrote:
As much as I like smaller bodies I haven't gone for any of the A7c series for the following
2. I really don't like the rear screen flipping out to the side
3. Lack of customisable buttons especially compared to the A1 but even the A7r5
4. EVF
5. Only 1 card slot
Of course these things are personal preferences but having played with the camera in store the actual body is basically the same size as the A7,A9 and A1 series cameras and it is only the housing for the EVF that makes them taller and heavier
These things truly are very individual and personal. I've gone round and round on these issues in my own thinking.
Compared to the A7CR, the A7RV is 40% heavier, 30% thicker, 6% wider, and 36% taller, per the site Camera Comparison. They do in fact feel very different to me, in use and to carry. With a small lens, the A7CR feels lithe in hand. But there is no compromise at all to image quality. The A1 is a wonderful beast, but it is also about the same size as the A7RV. The A9 is smaller than the current A7R or A1 bodies, and it has a stacked sensor. I like mine a lot, but it is only 24 mpix. The A7RIII, with a beautiful sensor, is the same size as the A9. So, as a landscape camera especially, if one is fine with 42mpix it may be a good compromise of size and image quality.
The whole point of the A7Cxx series is that they are notably small without any sacrifice to the maximum image quality that is possible in current full-frame cameras, as would happen if one goes to a smaller sensor. The ergo differences may matter or not to different people. I do find them acceptable. The thing I would change first if I could is the EVF, but even there the magnification factor is similar to that of the Leica M10 and M11 bodies, which no one ever complains about.
|