rscheffler Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Is it a 42" light source, or 24"? You mentioned Rapid Box small beauty dish... If it's 24" IMO it's a bit on the small side for 'soft' light. The larger the light source and the closer it is to your subject, the softer, more wraparound the light will be. You can add as much diffusion as you want but the shininess of the skin will be a factor and I feel is ultimately the cause of your concerns here. If you're editing in Adobe, such as Lightroom, you could do an AI mask of just the skin tones (just face or also face and body) and apply negative texture and clarity values to moderate the shininess. But it will also kill the shadows. You could try brushing in negative texture and clarity just to the highlight areas, which I have done in the example below:
It doesn't totally remove the highlights, but I don't think you want to anyway. If you did, the skin may look unnaturally flat.
jportraits wrote:
it looks shaked. what are expoaure parameters.l? looks like you have more sources of lights. could you post closeup of eyes. from the picture that is sharp.
I think there is a reflector bouncing light from below based on the reflection in the eyes.
I agree there is something strange going on at the top and bottom edges of the photos that looks like a problem with the lens. Sharpness falls off rapidly and details look smeared. What lens, what aperture? If you're shooting wide open, try stopping down a bit.
|