AmbientMike Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Pixelpuffin wrote:
I’d like to start topics away from the current and constant threads on R gear.
Can we discuss old sleeper lenses that you’ve stumbled upon again, maybe ones you disregarded first time round ? But now, learning more you’ve found an appreciation??
I’ll start..
The EF 28-135 IS USM
Bought this new back in the 90’s. Really hated it. Returned and managed to get a refund. Then last year stumbled on amazingly clear pictures online, turns out they were taken on the humble 6D with this very lens….off I went!!
Managed to find a one owner boxed mint with hood for very little outlay. Tried it on my 6D with all the lens corrections turned on… wow!!
Since then I’ve used it on my 5diii too, feels better on the 5diii as the heft offsets the lens weight.
Another is… don’t laugh…ef 22-55. Costs literally pennies but gave really nice results on FF, vignettes like crazy but somehow that’s part of its appeal.
So, come on
Let’s have a discussion…
Update:
Just off out with 6d and… ancient ef 55-200 ultrasonic. Ha Ha 🤣
Liberating 👍🏻 I’ll pop the 22-55 in the bag too!...Show more →
Love the 55-250, had 1st version, build and IS much better on STM I currently own. Really great zoom macro, 88-400 ff equivalent under 1 lb! Great hiking lens, who says mirrorless is lighter
I really liked the 18-135 IS quite a bit, a favorite indoor lens believeit or not. Probably more like 120mm (not 135mm imo) at the long end, af pretty inaccurate (like a lit if lenses) <35mm or so, got good photo of an owl at 1/8-1/10 sec hh one time though, took several got some at these ridiculously low ss.
Also 300/4 non IS looks great never tried though. I remember looking at 22-55, isn't that an aps lens, for those film cartridges that came out in the late 90's or something? Hung on to data for better film printing IIRC
|