Pixelpuffin Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
IlyaSnopchenko wrote:
16-35mm f/4L IS;
Indeed, the 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 too;
Actually both are doing double duty on FF now in my case. I'm using the 1D Mark IV rarely now, but it's far from obsolete.
Then again , the 70-200 and 100-400 teles are good on any format, as are the bright primes. I just wasn't a man to agonise over numbers and equivalence. My go-to combo was the 16-35 + either 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300 or Canon 100-400. The lenses are still the same, actually.
Great choices 👍🏻
I just went to grab mine and got sidetracked by my 6d/40 😂
Just been outside and admit I had forgotten just how great that combo is, even wide open at 2.8 it’s sharp, but switch to live view and it gets even sharper!! Admittedly the AF is sluggish 😂.
I’m off out tomorrow, taking the 6D/40…that’s all.
I’ve gotten so hung up on GAS recently (it’s all this forum talks about these days - pretty certain it’s canon bots fuelling gear envy) I had forgotten that these old cameras (and lenses) still deliver, albeit a little slower.
|