Mike Jacks0n Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
jedibrain wrote:
While there is a non-zero chance its all a ploy by big evil Canon to force your cramped hand to pull out the plastic and order an R1, I think physics is more of a factor.
The LPE6xx batteries, in a tray, are wider than an LC-E19 battery. This limits the narrowness of the bolt on grips. The AFon and joystick, to match the relative placement of the same buttons in landscape orientation, would have to sit on or near the seam between the body and grip, which is obviously impossible. I rented an R3 two weeks ago, and actually measured it side by side with my R5 and grip. Could Canon do better? Maybe. Probably. But I also don't think it will ever be quite the same as an integrated grip camera.
Brian ...Show more →
I guess we'll just have differing opinions on it. I feel like they could do better making the grip feel more like the camera body in terms of placement. Also note, its nothing to do with the narrowness or thickness of the grip, for me. Its completely a button placement thing. Again this one is closer, but still a little ways off.
As far as conspiracy theories or a money 'ploy', it wouldn't be the first time Canon has done something like this to get people to pull out the wallet. Things have been done in the past to differentiate the models, and I don't see that changing anytime soon. Personally, I would have preferred an R5 II in an R3 body and would have happily paid for it, but those aren't the cards we were dealt.
|