Home · Register · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username  

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | General Gear-talk | Join Upload & Sell

  

iPhone 15 Pro Max ProRAW vs RAW, Editing, and maximizing image quality

  
 
lsquare
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · p.1 #1 · iPhone 15 Pro Max ProRAW vs RAW, Editing, and maximizing image quality


The iPhone 15 Pro Max is clearly an incredible tool that's capable of producing high-quality images. I haven't seen too many articles about maximizing image quality out of the iPhone.

Has there ever been any testing done to determine which RAW format is the best?

I think an Apple exec said shooting a 24 MP ProRAW image will yield the maximum dynamic range. Has there been any tests between 12 MP, 24 MP, or 48 MP to determine that?

I was surprised to learn that Topaz and DxO don't support ProRAW. I'm not getting the impression that Lightroom's support of ProRAW is very good. What's the best software to edit ProRAW?

I'm wondering if running a regular 12 MP RAW through Topaz Photo AI or DxO PureRAW will yield the best possible result.



Aug 27, 2024 at 04:37 AM
CanadaMark
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · p.1 #2 · iPhone 15 Pro Max ProRAW vs RAW, Editing, and maximizing image quality


I think the reason you don't see this as a very popular topic is that 99% of users are not shooting RAW images with their iPhones.

The biggest reason is that when you shoot RAW on an iPhone, you lose most of the computational image stacking benefits which reduces noise and gives you a tone-mapped HDR with the click of a button. Samsung is currently the only smartphone manufacturer that offers computationally stacked HDRs in RAW format. The amount of effort it would take to get a RAW iPhone image to look as good as the automatically processed JPEG is quite a lot and that just isn't something most users are going to do.

Another thing to consider is that the iPhone sensors are still extremely small, and there is only so much you can do with the RAW files. The processing leeway, noise performance, and lens quality are nowhere near that of a 'regular' camera and all those shortcomings are brought to the forefront when you shoot RAW.

Finally, the iPhone uses a Quad Bayer sensor, which behaves much more like a 12MP sensor even though it can technically shoot 48MP and has 48M photosites. This is not the same as an increase from 12MP to 48MP on a traditional Bayer sensor that you would find in a MILC or similar. Quad Bayer arrays use blocks of 4 pixels of the same color, meaning the pixels with different colors are farther apart, and demosaicing is less effective. When used in 12MP mode, each group of 4 pixels behaves as one for better low light sensitivity, and they can also take 2 exposures at the same time which assists with the automatic HDR processing and night modes. The reason smartphone manufacturers like Quad Bayer sensors is because it allows them to advertise higher MP counts (which customers love), and the dual exposure capability assists with certain computational photography processes.

In low light, regardless of file format, your best image quality will be in 12MP mode, and in bright sunlight you will see a small increase in resolution using 48MP mode but you might notice that you still prefer 12MP mode if you are pixel peeping and sometimes the 12MP images still have better detail. The higher MP modes work best in very bright light.

The reason programs like DXO/Topaz do not support Apple ProRAW with their RAW models is because it's not really a RAW image, they are already demosaiced, sometimes contain information from multiple frames, and are pre-processed to a certain degree (probably a ton of distortion and vignette correction) despite being labeled a RAW image. They are in a DNG file container so that most third party programs can open them without issue, but they are not actually RAW files.



Aug 30, 2024 at 05:13 PM
lsquare
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #3 · p.1 #3 · iPhone 15 Pro Max ProRAW vs RAW, Editing, and maximizing image quality




CanadaMark wrote:
I think the reason you don't see this as a very popular topic is that 99% of users are not shooting RAW images with their iPhones.

The biggest reason is that when you shoot RAW on an iPhone, you lose most of the computational image stacking benefits which reduces noise and gives you a tone-mapped HDR with the click of a button. Samsung is currently the only smartphone manufacturer that offers computationally stacked HDRs in RAW format. The amount of effort it would take to get a RAW iPhone image to look as good as the automatically processed JPEG is
...Show more

Hi Mark,

I understand your point, but given the nature of this forum, I figure there would be an interest in determining which format and mode will yield the highest-quality photo. A quick search on Google doesn't seem to show any detailed articles about the topic. I get that most people won't care. It seems like the discussions on Reddit are mostly opinions. With the advanced software and hardware on the market today, I figure there may be a way to get better results post-processing the files through LR, Topaz, or even DxO.



Sep 12, 2024 at 07:41 PM
CanadaMark
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #4 · p.1 #4 · iPhone 15 Pro Max ProRAW vs RAW, Editing, and maximizing image quality


lsquare wrote:
Hi Mark,

I understand your point, but given the nature of this forum, I figure there would be an interest in determining which format and mode will yield the highest-quality photo. A quick search on Google doesn't seem to show any detailed articles about the topic. I get that most people won't care. It seems like the discussions on Reddit are mostly opinions. With the advanced software and hardware on the market today, I figure there may be a way to get better results post-processing the files through LR, Topaz, or even DxO.


You probably can get better results yourself, but it would take a lot of work and be very time consuming. Programs like DXO Pure RAW won't work with files that aren't actually RAW files, but Topaz and Adobe should depending on the method.

If you wanted to try replicate smartphone output with 'RAW' files from your iPhone, you would first want to take a set of photos on a tripod at different exposures as if you were prepping to make a HDR. Then you would blend them together to lower noise (stacking images reduces noise because nose occurs randomly) and create a HDR image with tone mapping, luminosity masks, etc. This is what your phone is doing in a split second every time you take a photo, along with frame alignment to account for the fact that you are most likely shooting handheld. Distortion and vignette control are usually baked into the RAW because smartphone lenses are not good and rely on a ton of software correction. You would not be able to replicate or improve upon the immediate output you normally get from a smartphone with just a single file because the smartphone is not using a single file.

Even after all that work, the end result would still be a far cry from a single processed image from a larger sensor camera, though I realize that is a moot point if you don't have your 'real' camera with you at the time

What you are hoping for is certainly understandable, but the two main hurdles that remain are 1) Shooting RAW with your phone is not actually producing RAW files, which limits what the software can do with them and 2) You need a whole set of identically framed 'RAW' photos at different exposures to work with before you even begin.

It certainly highlights how impressive it is to get the output we do in a blink of an eye from our smartphones these days!



Sep 21, 2024 at 02:38 PM







FM Forums | General Gear-talk | Join Upload & Sell

    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username       Or Reset password



This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.