gmccroskery Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
I know this question gets beat to death, but I am curious as to people's thoughts on using, or not using a protective lens filter.
The reason I ask, is that I have always been a dedicated filter user, but I did some in-studio testing with my Olympus 100-400mm and a couple different filters, and was a bit surprised by the results. The testing included shooting on a tripod, indoors, using a wireless remote -- with the lens at full zoom (Since my main concern is bird feather detail).
I had been using a 'Pro Master' 72mm HGX Protection filter on that lens, but came to realize after some testing that it was degrading fine detail quite a bit, compared to shooting without it.
Then I tested the lens with a B+W XS-Pro UV MRC nano filter, and even though there is a huge improvement over the Pro Master, there is still a very noticeable difference in fine detail without any filter at all.
I'm seriously thinking of ditching filters all together, except in situations where conditions would call for protection of my front element.
Thoughts
Greg
|