Back to Quick Links
Flare Resistance
Usually, 50mm lenses with fewer elements and simpler designs offer great flare resistance, especially if they have modern multi-coated elements. However, this isn't always true for all symmetrical designs. For example, the Zeiss 50mm f/2 Planar and Leica 50mm f/2 Summicron aren't known for their flare resistance.
The Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar has fewer elements than the Voigtlander 50mm f/2 APO-Lanthar and has an optical design reminiscent of the symmetrical "Planar." This made me wonder if it would perform as well as the f/2 version in terms of flare resistance. However, my tests show that both lenses have similar resistance to veiling and ghosting. This is great news for the 50mm f/3.5, as the f/2 version is known for its excellent flare resistance.
Cosina prioritizes flare resistance in their optical designs, along with excellent multi-coating. Given the small front element and simpler optical design of the Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar, I expected it to perform well. After many days of testing against light at different times of the day, I can confidently say that this lens is indeed flare-resistant, especially compared to other 50mm M lenses. I found it challenging to produce significant veiling flare unless I pushed the lens to its limits (as shown in a sample below). For these tests, I didn't use the lens hood when comparing to the CV 50mm f/2 APO because I wanted to see if the hood was even necessary.
In the images below, we will analyze the flare resistance of the Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO compared to the Voigtlander 50mm f/2 APO. I was unable to induce any ghosting with the f/3.5 lens, except in one instance where I noticed a ring flare, likely caused by the chrome ring of the lens. This issue probably won't happen with the black models or when the hood is attached, but I'll confirm it when I test the black versions.
Sun positioned just above the frame. No signs of veiling or ghosting.
LEICA M10-R Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar lens 50mm 1/4000s 100 ISO -0.7 EV
Sun positioned just above the frame. No signs of veiling or ghosting.
LEICA M10-R Voigtlander 50mm f/2 APO-Lanthar lens 50mm 1/4000s 100 ISO -0.7 EV
Around 2 PM. Some green ghosting on the front wood.
LEICA M10-R Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar lens 50mm 1/1000s 100 ISO -0.7 EV
Some green ghosting on the front wood.
LEICA M10-R Voigtlander 50mm f/2 APO-Lanthar lens 50mm 1/1000s 100 ISO -0.7 EV
Low sun at 6 PM. Very challenging backlighting with no ghosting, but slight veiling from the CV 50/2 APO.
LEICA M10-R Voigtlander 50mm f/2 APO-Lanthar lens 50mm f/3.5 1/2000s 100 ISO -1.3 EV
Same scene with slightly higher contrast and less veiling from the f/3.5 (both lenses set to f/4).
LEICA M10-R Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar lens 50mm f/3.5 1/1600s 100 ISO -1.3 EV
Veiling flare from the CV 50/2 APO is very rare but I manage to get a sample.
LEICA M10-R Voigtlander 50mm f/2 APO-Lanthar lens 50mm 1/400s 100 ISO -0.7 EV
Similar results for the f/3.5.
Slightly more veiling and ghosting from the CV 50/2 APO.
LEICA M10-R Voigtlander 50mm f/2 APO-Lanthar lens 50mm 1/640s 100 ISO -0.7 EV
Less flare overall, but there is some ring flare, likely caused by the chrome metal.
LEICA M10-R Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar lens 50mm 1/640s 100 ISO -0.7 EV
Excellent performance with the sun directly overhead. Around 4 PM.
LEICA M10-R Voigtlander 50mm f/2 APO-Lanthar lens 50mm 1/2500s 100 ISO -0.7 EV
Excellent performance with the sun directly overhead. Around 4 PM.
LEICA M10-R Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar lens 50mm 1/2500s 100 ISO -0.7 EV