Fred Miranda Offline Admin Upload & Sell: On
|
hmzimelka wrote:
Here are some more M11 DNG samples. At this rate, I think I still prefer my Summicron-M.
Leica M11 with APO-Lanthar 50mm f/3.5 Type II (Uncoded)
ISO64, 1/750sec, f/5.6
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53981968951_66ae5b42c9_o.jpg
I think there are many great 50mm lenses out there, and I agree that the Leica 50mm f/2 Summicron is one of the best. However, there are several situations where the Voigtlander 50mm f/3.5 APO-Lanthar performs better, which might not be covered in your tests but are significant differences between these lenses.
The Voigtlander lens can focus closer (LV), offering 0.45m or 0.35m depending on the version, compared to the 0.7m of the Leica. The Voigtlander handles flare better, which will be noticeable in backlit shots. For resolution and contrast, while the Leica is very good, the Voigtlander 50/3.5 APO-Lanthar is even better, especially in areas away from the center, though this might not show in your current comparison samples.
The Voigtlander lens does not cause frameline blockage, just like the Summicron. The APO design of the Voigtlander ensures no color errors. The Voigtlander also produces a flat field curvature, while the Summicron shows slight outward curvature. The Voigtlander produces defined sunstars starting at f/4, which you may prefer.
These differences might not matter for your photography style, and in that case, the 50mm f/2 Summicron could indeed be a better fit for you.
|