cpe1991 Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
stanj wrote:
Thanks! The R5m2 tracks a lot better than the R5, but the R3 still tracks better, and most importantly, high ISO is so so much better with the R3. The R5m2 looks worse than the R5 thus far in this regard. I prefer the resolution of the R5 because the R3 doesn't fill my screen, but once you get above 6400 or so, things start going south for the R5m2 pretty quickly. Again, not quite apples to apples because DXO isn't out yet, but using LR Denoise, there's worlds.
In the absence of DxO, I tried LR and PS denoise and found it very slow and not particulary good. Using LR (or DPP4) to convert RAW and saving to jpeg without any noise reduction or sharpening and then denoising and sharpening with Topaz AI gave much cleaner and more detailed results. It's a real pain having to wait for DxO as it works so well with high resolution sensors.
|