Fred Miranda Offline Admin Upload & Sell: On
|
RustyBug wrote:
I've got the Panny 85/1.8 for my SL2-S. It was nearly a "throw in" when I did some gear trading to try out the SL.
Optics are nice enough, etc. ... but, there is no such thing as a free lunch, and I'm wondering if you "get what you pay for" in terms of AF responsiveness (not a complaint, just realistic expectation).
That said, I'm wondering about the Leica SL 75/2 ... and the build with dual motors, etc., as to what to expect. Wondering if anyone has any experience with it, and how they'd rate it, as ... meh, the extra $$$ spend isn't getting any AF performance gains to make it worth the spend. Optics, I've got my M 75/2.4, so unless there's a reason to spend for the SL to get a bump in AF responsiveness.
I might consider the SL 90 ... same question regarding AF build / performance....Show more →
At one time, I owned both the SL 75mm and 90mm lenses and used them with the SL2 body. I found the autofocus to be fast but not always reliable, particularly with EyeAF. However, using the focus point in AF-S mode was very accurate. If you’re looking for optical excellence at every level, the SL 75mm f/2 is a great choice.
|