gear-nut
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
|
MHLC wrote:
Going by the rumors of it being a Mk2, I hope they reduce the size. The current 16-55 is just heavy for what it is. It's comparable to the Nikon 24-120 f4 and the Canon 24-105 in terms of cost, size, weight but shorter in the long end.
Personally, I would like it have a similiar size/weight while extending the long end so it's comparable to the FF f4 lens.
Actually, the 16-80 f4 is the one to compare to the N 24-120 as it’s the same aperture and range — and it is around half the size and weight as the Nikon option. Now compare the 16-55/2.8 to the N 24-70/2.8 and again, the 16-55 is significantly smaller with more range.
|
