rscheffler
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
|
JackRyanD wrote:
i think i’m just gonna spring for the r5 at this point— i’m printing a2 and a3 so id like peace of mind when it comes to that and future proofing, plus it gives me room to expand into video if i choose to do that.
real question now is glass— do i spring for the rf 24-70 2.8 or do i just go for the ef and save money for more glass
The R5 has IBIS so that focal length range doesn't really benefit that much more from optical IS in the RF version. Based on the brief comparison I did of the RF against the v2 EF, I didn't see image quality difference that would sway me one way or the other. Going with the EF will save you a lot of money now and give you time to decide options. IMO if you're planning to also do video, 24-70 is a bit restrictive on the long end and I prefer 24-105. The new 24-105/2.8 is a fabulous lens in many ways and completely outclasses the 24-70 options, but is also very expensive.
I agree that if you're going to spend on RF now, it's the 70-200 that is worth getting instead of an EF version (if you're OK with no TC compatibility).
|
