Mike_5D Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
stanj wrote:
Yes, I have tried. Back in the days when PM was much faster than LR, but in the new versions of LR once you have previews generated you can flip thru images like a movie, so the challenge is really the preview generation. My point is that PM doesn't render previews but rather relies on the embedded previews, completely undermining my goal of reviewing what the render would look like (with auto settings, or with large batch settings applied). So for this workflow to work you have to render the 1:1 previews, otherwise you're comparing apples with oranges.
The other reason why I don't use PM or other tools for culling anymore is that there's only so many apps that I want to have in my workflow. Back when LR was slow I had my own workflow with an external culling app, but that's really not necessary anymore. Once we get GPU support for preview generation that whole step will be moot, too....Show more →
I did a trial of PM during January 2020 for my daughter's all-star tournament. At the time, LR was painfully slow. Like, so slow that simply selecting a handful of images and applying a star rating felt like I was using a Pentium II with a 4500 rpm hard drive. PM is great for blasting through action shots where I'm just looking for a small number of "maybes" that warrant a deeper look. The embedded preview is sufficient for determining that a shot of someone's back with no ball in frame is junk. I wasn't too fond of having another step in the workflow, but using PM reduced the number of images that made it into LR, saving time in LR.
I was planning to buy PM for the spring season, but that never happened. Without any high-volume shooting, there was no need for PM. By the time there was anything to shoot again, LR's performance had improved a lot. I'm not a pro and nobody is demanding photos in real time, so LR is fine now. Also, PM became a subscription product, and I don't need to spend more on PM than I do on LR+PS.
|