rscheffler Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.2 #1 · p.2 #1 · Help - macOS 14 Sonoma - frequent external disk disconnections | |
lsquare wrote:
Is Sabrent a reputable brand? Why didn't you buy a NAS, but instead using what appears to be a Sabrent 5-bay DAS.
Sabrent seem to be pretty reputable and I guess have been around long enough. The little I've had to contact them for support they were responsive and honored their warranty. I bought three Sabrent USB-C NVMe enclosures more for the features and price point than the brand. They worked perfectly with my system until the macOS 14 upgrade. The major reason I bought the Sabrent 5-bay enclosure was because of its tray-less design that allows me to easily swap my many HDDs (I have a lot of HDDs).
Let's clarify terminology because NAS in particular has caused confusion in past threads. DAS = Direct Attached Storage. NAS = Network Attached Storage. Many equate NAS to be RAID, which can be a configuration option, whether hardware or software RAID. But NAS can also be individual drives.
Prior to getting the MBP M1 Pro system in 2022 I had cobbled together a collection of 2009-2011 vintage Macs with the 27" 2009 iMac being my primary editing system. Due to the age of all these devices, they all only had USB-2 ports, or FW800 on the iMac. The 2011 MBP did have TB, so I got a TB hub and a USB-3 5-bay enclosure to connect to it. But because I used the iMac for editing, the MBP became a network file server and the 5-bay enclosure became a NAS (non-RAID). This all worked fine. File transfer speeds over the network were fast enough and Lightroom was perfectly happy to link to the networked volumes (though I did use Smart Previews to speed up general LR editing). So I actually was using NAS until 2022...
The MBP M1 Pro is now my main editing system and I no longer have need to access files over a network, therefore the Sabrent USB-C 5-bay enclosure works perfectly fine as a DAS.
Regarding RAID, or lack thereof: I have zero interest in adding another layer of complexity and potential point of failure. If I was to do RAID, it would be RAID 6 for two-drive redundancy. Given that the potential size of an array now could easily be 30+TB, I'd be very uncomfortable for the long period of time it would take to rebuild a RAID 5 array without redundancy. Of course no one should use a RAID as their archive without other forms of backup... IMO the primary benefit of a RAID is to create a single giant volume on which one can keep everything for easy access. I don't have a need for this, therefore I don't have a need for a RAID solution. Nor do I have a need for RAID 0 speed, especially now with a single relatively inexpensive NVMe in a TB3/4 enclosure pushing about 3GB/s, which was impossible to achieve with a typical home-brew HDD-based RAID 0 array.
|