Fred Miranda Offline Admin Upload & Sell: On
|
hanay78 wrote:
Dear Fred, I am curious about the thin filter conversion today. I have the impression that many M-mount lens users simply go Nikon. In your opinion, is thin filter conversion still the better way to go for Leica glass in EVF? Probably A7RII with the conversion is cheaper than a stock Z7
---------------------------------------------
mskad2 wrote:
Note that once converted, performance of native E lens on Kolari modified Sony cameras is worse. This is why I am hesitant to convert my A7RII (and also the fact that I only have 2 M mount lenses).
---------------------------------------------
Fred Miranda wrote:
It depends on the lens. With some lenses the conversion actually improves their native outwards field curvature. Having said that, you should not convert if you plan on using E-mount lenses on it. It should be a dedicated body for M lenses.
Following up on this discussion, I was curious about how my Loxia 35/2 Biogon and Loxia 50/2 Planar E-mount lenses would perform on the Kolari-modded A7R II. The result is that they perform better off-axis on the Kolari-modified version compared to the standard A7R II. I've noticed similar improvements with other E-mount AF lenses I've tested, but this enhancement is specific to lenses that benefit from the "field curvature" change caused by the thinner cover glass.
I considered selling my Loxia lenses because I could use my 35/50 M-mount lenses on the A7R II UT. However, since the Loxia lenses perform even better than before, I'm keeping them for the nostalgia, their aesthetic appeal, and their electronic transmission features.
|