p.1 #4 · p.1 #4 · Interesting new tripod from Really Right Stuff
jeffbuzz wrote:
Can someone please explain the use case for the "quadpod"?
I think they explained it on their product page.
'designed specifically for photographers who prioritize mobility without sacrificing stability and performance. Perfect for backcountry adventurers, the TFCX-13 meets the demands of those who need reliable support in challenging environments.'
The weight is the key thing. At 2.1lbs it's incredibly light. It actually weighs LESS than my 50mm Tokina Opera.
That lightness means enhanced portability which makes it a great hiking/backcountry tripod.
p.1 #9 · p.1 #9 · Interesting new tripod from Really Right Stuff
Here's the Quadpod link,,, this is one BIG honking beast at 76" tall and 8.2 lbs. Supports 120 lbs. This is an anti-tipping design. Ironically, I had designed one just like this,,, just a few months back. There are advanteges, and disadvantages (especially levelling and set-up time))
p.1 #11 · p.1 #11 · Interesting new tripod from Really Right Stuff
I'm a bit surprised that Novoflex doesn't seem to get much attention on this side of "the Pond". I came close to buying their multi-row pano head roughly 10 years ago. Joe Brody was demo'ing that item on Youtube. They've been around for 70 years. Ultimately, I didn't buy because I was concerned about the very tiny blue knobs,,, and they're certainly not cheap.
p.1 #13 · p.1 #13 · Interesting new tripod from Really Right Stuff
A better choice is the Feisol CT-3441S that I own. It costs half as much as the RRS tripod and has a bettery working height of 50.4 inches before extending the center column and supports a greater load with it 44 lb capacity. The Feisol also is more compact as it collapses down to 17.9 inches which is shorter than the bare RRS tripod and 4 inches shorter than the RRS version with the riser. The Feisol legs also include and excellent carry case. With RRS all I ever got was a cardboard box and needed to spend another $100 to get a carry case.
Not a difficult decision whether to spend $495 on the Feisol CT-3441S or $1,035 on the RRS TFCX. I cannot understand why any person would make the objective decision to buy RRS products when there are better designed products selling for less.
p.1 #14 · p.1 #14 · Interesting new tripod from Really Right Stuff
well, i wouldn't worry about it. it was an easy choice for me.
the bag i got with the feisol was pretty much basic boilerplate build which for me was useless
i had my case made/modded. i had the option of purchasing a retail bag but i chose to control its design to my liking/needs.
-no zipper
-compression buckles that are easily replaced w/o sewing being involved
-fits the multiple size tripods i use and can carry a combo load of 1 tripod 1 monopod.
-its built to last
-multi mount option
-oh, it even has a drain hole at the bottom
i do think that RRS has better designed tools overall. and i'ved had no real problems in investing in tools in my life. they have always helped keep me employed.
i did own a Feisol previously. it was a good tripod but with some minor niggles. i found out later the RRS was a better thought out one though. the devil was in the details.
p.1 #18 · p.1 #18 · Interesting new tripod from Really Right Stuff
nhanzero wrote:
I feel for you, RRS is top notch, you buy for life.
I am already married... Don't need another "thing" to look at till I die and spend more on than I can afford (but I still love you honey if you are reading this )
On the TCFX - max height 41 inches. That is dangerously close to being useless as a photography tripod. RRS in particular is now all in on the gun stuff.
The Leofoto LS-284C is 6 inches taller even after opening the leg angle to 25 degrees, weighs 5 oz more, costs 1/7th if you buy it at the right time of year, and seems to perform shockingly close to the RRS offerings
mine has seen lots of travel and is going out tomorrow. in my pack.