snegron7 Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Choderboy wrote:
You can post pics here, as you said, using Flickr (or other hosting site).
Eye AF can be used without tracking.
If you are going to maintain that there is a major difference between APS-C and Full Frame, I doubt people will take you seriously.
Googling "full frame vs aps-c blind test" or similar is all it takes to convince anyone.
I'll take some pics this weekend and post tgem on Flickr with a link.
Please don't misunderstand me. I'm not knocking APS-C. I used APS-C successfully for several years before going full frame. APS-C has its place and its merits; however,low-light performance and
dynamic range are not strong points of APS-C compared to full frame. Yes, APS-C performs great outdoors for sports and wildlife, but there is a reason why wedding and portrait photographers use full frame. Also, again, not knocking APS-C, but if APS-C was the best format in the world for every type of photography (including low light performance), why are full frame cameras even on the market?
What I shoot most is interior photography. People inside dimly lit places. Dimly lit churches, castles, etc. The right tool for the job in my case is a full frame camera with fast, wide lenses.
I actually have shot interior, low light shots with APS-C cameras in the past, and I can say from experience that the results (for me) are way better with full frame than with APS-C.
That being said, my current A7c does not capture details as well as my old A7c.
|