Leica Apo-Summicron-M 35mm vs Voigtlander APO-Lanthar

stkhapugin
Offline
•
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #1 · p.1 #1 · Leica Apo-Summicron-M 35mm vs Voigtlander APO-Lanthar

Since the two lenses were announced in early 2021, I was very curious to see how they compare.
We know that the 50mm APOs have a very similar image quality, the Voigtlander being marginally larger, 8 times cheaper, and having arguably better ergonomics. Many would argue the Voigt is actually the better lens optically. And all of this makes sense: the Leica lens is 8 years older and a bit smaller, putting it at a disadvantage.
The two 35mm APOs, however, are released within a month from one another. Again, the Voigtlander is larger, 8 times cheaper, but this time it can't focus as close. But was Cosina able to use these tradeoffs to build a higher optically performing lens?

Somehow, even three years later, I can't find a direct comparison between these two. So when I finally found a copy of the Leica, I decided to get both lenses, run some tests, and return the one I like less. Frankly, I was hoping the Voigtlander is going to come out on top.

I can't attach images here, so I uploaded them to Google Drive, shot at f/2 if the file name doesn't state otherwise.
For fun, I threw in a couple of images with the Ultron 35/1.7 (at f2) and the RX1R II.

What I'm seeing is: Leica has way nicer bokeh due to low optical vignetting, is sharper in the center at all distances, sharper overall, is better corrected for chromatic aberrations. The only downside I see is the noticeable pincushion distortion.
The Voigtlander has a bit more contrast and less distortion, but the bokeh has a lot of artefacts.

Curious to hear what you think! And I still have the Voigt for another day, so let me know if I should test something else before returning it.

Mar 10, 2024 at 01:07 PM

Fred Miranda
Offline
Admin
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #2 · p.1 #2 · Leica Apo-Summicron-M 35mm vs Voigtlander APO-Lanthar

I've been curious to see this comparison, but unfortunately, I don't have access to your google drive.
Have requested a Leica 35/2 APO loan 3 years ago to compare to the Voigtlander and so far nothing. Thanks for posting.

Did you use LV to focus the samples?

Mar 10, 2024 at 02:39 PM

stkhapugin
Offline
•
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #3 · p.1 #3 · Leica Apo-Summicron-M 35mm vs Voigtlander APO-Lanthar

Sorry about that, fixed the access, same link should work now.

Yes, focus with LV, refocusing on every shot except tripod shots of the 20 euro bill which are focused at the center and not refocused when the bill moves around the frame

Mar 10, 2024 at 02:52 PM

Fred Miranda
Offline
Admin
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #4 · p.1 #4 · Leica Apo-Summicron-M 35mm vs Voigtlander APO-Lanthar

I was able to check your test. Thanks again for posting!

What I'm seeing is: Leica has way nicer bokeh due to low optical vignetting, is sharper in the center at all distances, sharper overall, is better corrected for chromatic aberrations. The only downside I see is the noticeable pincushion distortion.
The Voigtlander has a bit more contrast and less distortion, but the bokeh has a lot of artefacts.

I agree with some of your observations. The Leica 35/2 APO shows lower optical vignetting, leading to more rounded bokeh balls off-axis. The transition zone is also smoother, resulting in less structured rendering. Rendering is subjective; some may prefer the character of the Voigtlander lens, while others may prefer the more predictable and modern look of the Leica APO.

Axial chromatic aberration appears to be similar in both lenses. Some side-by-side comparisons show less purple fringing for the Voigtlander, while others show less for the Leica, resulting in mixed results. It seems that both lenses correct axial CA similarly.

The Leica lens exhibits higher distortion and less micro-contrast, but since I only have access to JPEGs, I'm unsure about the processing applied to the images.

Overall, both lenses deliver superb resolution and contrast. Most differences could be attributed to copy variation, resulting in very minor discrepancies. The most noticeable differences are in distortion, contrast, and optical vignetting, but even these differences are not significant. Some of the comparisons show obvious misfocus, so it's challenging to comment on those images.

One thing is for sure: the Voigtlander offers better value for the money, but the Leica is significantly more compact.

Mar 10, 2024 at 09:43 PM

stkhapugin
Offline
•
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #5 · p.1 #5 · Leica Apo-Summicron-M 35mm vs Voigtlander APO-Lanthar

I’m happy to share RAW files if you’re interested. I have only adjusted the exposure and white balance in C1.

I absolutely agree with the better value for money for Voigtlander, it’s a game of diminishing returns. But IMO the optical vignetting, close focusing, and compactness are far superior on the Leica, while contrast/sharpness/micro contrast are all pretty close. Which I find really cool: Leica doesn’t always beat Voigtlander in optics, while always asking a higher price; here their lens department seems to have a real gem, both optically and mechanically.

Mar 11, 2024 at 05:25 AM

mark1958
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #6 · p.1 #6 · Leica Apo-Summicron-M 35mm vs Voigtlander APO-Lanthar

I have both lenses and have not done careful comparisons as I have been meaning to. From my limited non-controlled comparisons, I would agree with stkhapugin comments below. The lens was hard to find and I did happen to see one at a dealer when I was traveling and purchased it. The first one I received was substantially de-centered but the replacement which took a month to get is great. The size and closer focusing is a big plus.. I have also tried it out on the SL2 and while not quite as good in the corners is really quite good.

stkhapugin wrote:
I’m happy to share RAW files if you’re interested. I have only adjusted the exposure and white balance in C1.

I absolutely agree with the better value for money for Voigtlander, it’s a game of diminishing returns. But IMO the optical vignetting, close focusing, and compactness are far superior on the Leica, while contrast/sharpness/micro contrast are all pretty close. Which I find really cool: Leica doesn’t always beat Voigtlander in optics, while always asking a higher price; here their lens department seems to have a real gem, both optically and mechanically.

Mar 11, 2024 at 03:56 PM

Desmolicious
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #7 · p.1 #7 · Leica Apo-Summicron-M 35mm vs Voigtlander APO-Lanthar

If $$$ didn't matter to me, I would get the Leica 50 and 35 APOs just because of the size/handling.

Mar 11, 2024 at 05:16 PM

Fred Miranda
Offline
Admin
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #8 · p.1 #8 · Leica Apo-Summicron-M 35mm vs Voigtlander APO-Lanthar

Desmolicious wrote:
If $$$ didn't matter to me, I would get the Leica 50 and 35 APOs just because of the size/handling.

No doubt!

The newly announced Voigtlander 50/3.5 APO is small and can focus at close range. Maybe Cosina will release a 35 APO with similar build next.

Mar 11, 2024 at 05:37 PM


FM Forums \| Leica & Alternative Gear \| Join Upload & Sell

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.