Pixelpuffin Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
IlyaSnopchenko wrote:
The 28-135 sure was popular back in the day. Interestingly Sigma made something even more versatile - a 24-135/2.8-4.5 lens... But it had no HSM focusing and no IS, of course, because it was from the time way before Sigma had gone upmarket...
It's interesting that we're perennially finding allure in using something old and/or imperfect, despite the clear (and more explainable) desire for newest and greatest. My own secret favour (or maybe not so secret for those who have known me) is with the 24-85 lens, introduced in 1996 (the same year the 135/2 L and 17-35 L were actually premiered, by the way). Just yesterday I was using my copy on a visit to the Hermitage (decent pictures there, although the museum is pretty dark and lens seems to struggle on FF way more than it did on APS-H...) It's also going on a ride with me today to shoot a skiing event so you see, I'm not cutting it any slack... ...Show more →
Oh I knew about the the 24-85, I have one along with the 28-105 (both 3.5-4.5) also have the 28-80 mk1 I love the build quality of those lenses. Back in analogue era I had only my eos600 with 28-105 & 70-210 3.5-4.5 usm’s
I thought I was king of the hill, I used that 2 lens set up for anything and everything. Happy times indeed
Another old but gold is the EF 28-70 3.5-4.5 arc drive ( have a mint boxed copy) it apparently has a aspherical element in the optical train and is much valued by some today for being sharper than it needed to be.
Yep, happy times indeed.
|