rscheffler Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.9 #18 · p.9 #18 · New Cosina Voigtländer 50/3.5 APO & 50/2.2 VM announcement | |
^ A smart design would eliminate that possibility.
Fred Miranda wrote:
I was informed that it was a tough decision, but ultimately, "the air moving in/out with by collapsing brought too much dust to the sensor."
So, it seems that Cosina's decision was to maintain the aesthetics of a collapsible lens without the actual functionality, to prevent the side effect of gathering sensor dust when collapsing/extending the lens while attached to a camera.
To me that sounds more like an excuse for keeping manufacturing simpler and less expensive, realizing a greater profit margin at a specific price point.
Air displacement concerns doesn't appear to have dissuaded Leica from keeping the 90/4 Macro in the lineup. Perhaps because it's a 90mm lens, I never leave it on the camera as the grab and go lens. Therefore whenever I collapse it, it's always off-camera. A 50 could be different, being a more generalist focal length, it could stay on the camera where being able to collapse it would have practical benefit. As a Leica M shooter I'm already used to the sensor collecting way more dust than my other system, so would gladly take the convenience of a collapsing design in exchange for the remote probability that some more dust might end up on the sensor.
Whatever the case, the ship has sailed and it's a non-collapsible design. I'm looking forward to seeing how it performs and will decide from there.
|