gdanmitchell Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.2 #6 · p.2 #6 · Cheap prime v. expensive zoom - IQ difference? | |
John Power wrote:
So I have a 50mm 1.8 metal mount and a new to me 24-70mm Ver 2.
I have taken several test shots with each lens. Same lighting, same focal length; same image settings (2.8 and 5.6 in this case). Av mode. Same everything. These shots were taken in a period of about 5 minutes.
So I pull them up in DPP expecting to see a clear difference between the 2 lenses and.....nope. Maybe a tiny bit in favor of the 24-70 but even that is arguable. Both lenses look good.
Am I just paying for the convenience and versatility of the zoom?
Is this unusual?
Thanks....Show more →
The answer is a bit complicated and full of nuances.
There was a time, long ago, when zooms were more clearly optically inferior to primes. But today the best zooms are really excellent, and there’s often no “image quality” (e.g. sharpness, etc.) advantage to using primes instead of them.
The pluses of primes can be excellent image quality, smaller size, lower weight, lower cost. (If you pay more you can get larger maximum apertures or extreme focal lengths.) But you give up useful flexibility to get those advantages. If you are particular about focal lengths, carrying a single zoom may give you what would otherwise require three of four primes.
Regarding IQ, there’s something else to consider. If you love the angle of view of the prime(s) you use and don’t crop, you’ll get the full image quality of those lenses. On the other hand, if flexible angle of view (and the greater creative control over things like subject/foreground/background relationship) are important to you, a zoom lets you precisely “crop in camera” and maintain the full quality of the original fine. With primes you might instead end up using a compromise focal length and have to crop in post, at which point you lose some of that IQ.
To be clear, in either case, most photographers using modern equipment will get more than enough quality for their needs… and might not even see any difference.
As others have pointed out, some of the less expensive primes are actually quite good lenses. I’ve used several of them over the years and they give up nothing to excellent primes.
|