jedibrain Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
robbyphoto wrote:
I think if the R5 mk II came out in say 2 months I'd be kind of miffed. It depends on the price of course, but I think on paper it looks like it could perform better than my R7 with regards to faster readout speed. At least I think that's a potential benefit. Right now I'm using the electronic shutter and getting some weird results from what I assume is rolling shutter effect. It's not unusable, just sometimes I get some 'weird' frames.
I just bought one on black Friday.
Think of it this way. When the R5mk2 comes out this year, it'll cost at least $3800 and be hard to get for several months. You can get a used R5 right now for $2500 or less. And probably sell it for $2000 if you decide to buy a mk2. Cheap rental fee for a year of use.
I find the higher MP nice, but for all the people who told me my R6 was obsolete when it was released due to its 'low' resolution, I don't see a massive difference. The 50% increase in resolution is nice when you wan to crop, and surprisingly for macro stuff as well. For wild life, you may find it a great benefit on some subjects, but remember cropping is not a substitute for longer glass.
So my feel is, for <$2500 its a screaming deal and the best way to try out higher MP. I'm glad I got almost 3 good years out of my R6 before I bought it. As at the time the R6 saved me considerable money over the R5 + (expensive at the time) CFx cards.
Definitely happy I have it now though. May trade up the R6 to an R3, of if I'm really saucy an R1. Some guys get corvettes for their mid-life crisis...some guys get cameras.
Brian
|