RustyBug Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
flash wrote:
If you're a tripod shooter, maybe. The IBIS on the X2D is sensational. And personally, I think I'd go with an X2D and 907x/50C if you wanted one of each. I think for now, I'll keep my 50MP in 907x form as IBIS is less impactful.
But it is possibly the most beautiful digital camera made.
Gordon
The omission of the IBIS is a bit of a head scratcher. I get that its form factor lends itself for tripod based work ... BUT, it also lends itself toward WAIST LEVEL work, which is hand held, and the IBIS would be a nice feature for that.
Granted, the X2D has a flip screen, but the hand holding position (as designed) isn't the same.
I haven't gotten my hands on the 907x body yet, but looking at the direction of the shutter release, it is pressed in the direction that is inline (albeit offset) / parallel to the lens axis. The shutter release direction of force on a regular camera (X2D, etc.) is perpendicular (and offset) to the lens axis.
I dig on the leaf shutter having offsetting forces, vs. a focal plane shutter, which makes for a more stable camera. Leaf shutter, on axis shutter release AND IBIS would be the best of all worlds at mitigating camera related vibrations / movement. Two out of three ain't bad ... but, dang all THREE would have been the ideal. It's not like they didn't have the room in the body (vs. body size of X2D) ... so,
Not sure I need 100MP (read, I don't need it), so what's the main "upside" of getting the 100MP version (other than the 100MP) of the 907x, vs. the 50MP version? The X2D is attractive for the flip screen / IBIS. Not sure the attraction for the new 100MP 907x vs. the older 50MP 907x is as compelling. Although, I might still need to do a deeper dive into it ... even if the lack of IBIS is a bummer.
Secretly wishing that the hardware for the IBIS is in place for the 100MP 907x ... just waiting for some firmware to finish coding, before updating an implementation. Yeah, dreamin'.
|