Fred Miranda Offline Admin Upload & Sell: On
|
LAARILEY wrote:
I’m interested in this too. Do I stand to gain anything over the (old and optically messy) FE 28mm f/2 if I am considering the CV 28mm f/2 Ultron II, CV 28mm f/1.5 Nokton, and 7Artisans 28mm f/1.4 FE+? Or is the best current option that isn’t the stupidly large Sigma.. the Laowa 1.2?
Part of me is holding out hope that Cosina announces e-mount versions of the 28 Nokton and 50 f/1 at CP+ but I fully expect to be disappointed.
Why haven’t Sigma produced an I Series 28? I have and love the 35 and 90 and I would buy a 28 in a heartbeat. Is it really that difficult?...Show more →
The top 28mm choices for Sony cameras are lenses specifically designed for its sensor, and I agree that there aren't many available choices. The Sony FE 28/2 is still a good option, providing very good performance and strong resistance to flare. Some M-lenses outperform others, but wide-angle lenses, in general, show some degradation in IQ in a form of astigmatism and increased field curvature. However, stopping down the lens for a broader depth of field can mitigate these issues, and even with these lenses, performance can be very good on the Sony. However, they won't reach the same level of performance as they would on a Leica body.
In my experience, the CV 28/1.5 performed well on the Sony with some caveats. When wide open and focusing on a subject at mid-distance, there may be some inconsistencies in rendering, with out-of-focus corners appearing sharper sharper than it should, depending on the scene. For landscape photography or similar applications where consistent sharpness across the field is crucial, I recommend stopping the lens down to f/5.6 and beyond based on my results.
I also like shooting with 28mm lenses and it's quite disappointing that Sigma and other third party brands didn't develop a 28mm with AF for Sony. Perhaps their research indicates that most photographers prefer 24/25mm lenses instead. 
|