patotts Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
Listen to me: stick to Sony.
The Canon R6 II (not R6, I wouldn't go there) is a great body, esp for sports and hybrid shooting, but the Canon lens strategy is very strange. The have some stellar and singular glass, e.g. RF 28-70/2, 100-500, 100-300/2.8, but then I really dislike their affordable stuff like the RF 50/1.8 or RF 35/1.8.
Sony has long been known for their tech (sensor, AF, etc) but in reality I'd say it is their lens eco-system that sets them apart at this point. No other brand have stellar primes like the 20/1.8G, 24/1.4GM, 35/1.4GM, 50/1.4GM, etc. Plus you have Voigtlander, Sigma, Tamron, Zeiss, Samyang, Viltrox, and much more. So much choice for every budget and taste.
So... if you are intent to keep your Canon glass, perhaps getting the Canon R6 II a more compatible choice, but if you are a tight budget, Canon is not the way to go - their good RF glass are all very expensive.
Going Sony... Sony A7R4: that is a portrait and landscape machine, much more than a hybrid dream machine IMO. The sensor is high MP and has pretty bad rolling shutter. I would instead look at the Sony A7IV - less MPs but better AF, the new menu system, faster operations, dedicated photo/video switch, etc.
Lastly, I think you might be better of settling on something and sticking with it. Right now using older Canon EF lenses on older Sony technology/body. Either pick Sony or Canon. Stick to that and go all in.
|