kaldur Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
aCuria wrote:
Lenstip has reviews on both the 50/2i and 50/1.4GM.
According to them the GM is better by a significant margin in resolution
The GM should have better AF
Herearound the GM is slightly more than twice as expensive as the Sigma 50/2. It is somewhat larger and heavier (though as I understand not particularly large or heavy). Lenstip liked both of these lenses.
I've only read about somewhat wonky af on the 45/2,8 and have only personally experienced it wide open near mfd. I haven't read about weird af on the rest of the i-series though I would certainly think first party options are generally better in this regard. How good is good enough af, how much do you like the i-series (with their distinctive build), what do you care about weathersealing (the Sony appears better) and how sensitive are you to the difference in price (which might not be so great in your market)?
(The Sony 40 and 50 2,5 seem small and nice with stellar resolution and AF, I've never felt inclined toward them for they seem to have this outlining going on in the bokeh in many shots. Visible in Lenstip's statue portraits)
|