CanadaMark Online Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.2 #18 · p.2 #18 · Nikon Z8 - Noise in the Images and even in the Sky | |
bu82 wrote:
Hmm...I'm looking at the Z9 (as I posted in my thread about it), but this has me a bit concerned. I have also heard that the high ISO is not as good as "the competition", but that's OK. I don't mind some noise. But my workflow is Camera RAW and/or Lightroom. I've used it for 15 years+ and don't want to try another RAW converter. If the Z9 doesn't play nice with Adobe RAW converters, that could be a deal breaker for me. I don't have time for many events and sports to go through another step with DXO or whatever. With my Canon 1DXMKII and 5DMK4 I do it all in Camera RAW/Lightroom, including small NR that I may need. I will rent the camera and take it on a tough shoot and see for myself, but I don't like the sound of this..
If the high ISO noise on the Z9 is the same as on my 1DXMKII/5DMK4 then I'm fine. But if it's problematic in Camera Raw/LR, then I dunno. ...Show more →
DXO Pure RAW is a batch process, so it's actually a lot less work than trying to make the files look the same strictly in Adobe. It's not an alternative full featured editor to LR, it's a supplement (also it has LR integration if you prefer). The software itself is incredibly simple and you only click a couple of buttons. You would simply run the files through DXO Pure RAW, come back 10 min later or whatever when it's done, then take all the resulting DNG files into LR and edit as normal without having to worry about noise. This would save you a lot of time compared to fiddling with each individual file in LR trying to get a similar result.
I'd suggest downloading the free trial and see if you like it. If it's not your cup of tea, obviously that's completely fine and you can just stick with LR. You just sounded like a good candidate for the software which is why I brought it up.
No single piece of software has saved me more time than DXO which is why I like it so much. The way it applies lens corrections and sharpening (if you want) are also done in a way that is superior to any other program currently. This gives me the best possible starting point to continue my editing in LR/PS. You can get a similar result strictly using LR but it takes a lot longer and involves more steps.
As for ISO performance, I think someone posted the links above for you to look at, but at normalized resolution I think you will find that the Z9 actually outperforms the competition as well as your older Canon bodies both in ISO and DR.
|