wordfool Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
wind30 wrote:
…. A9ii is not an updated stacked sensor camera. Seriously u think that camera can compete today? A9ii can’t even compete with Sony a9, just look at the number of Sony a9 users now. I still use a Sony a9. That is how ancient Sony stacked sensor camera are now. I don’t even want to list the stuff Sony has developed since the a9 which they can add in a new camera with zero research cost.
The A9ii can't complete with the A9? Not sure I'm understanding your argument here. Sony did add a lot more tech into its cameras with the A7Rv, A1, and now the A9iii. And despite only minor updates from the original A9, the A9ii is still a good camera IMO (just as the og A9 is) and still one of only a handful of stacked sensor bodies on the market. Sure, there's now a huge price gap between the "old" A9ii and the A1/A9iii, but I'm sure that's something Sony market-researched to death and decided is OK for now. After all, these cameras are targeted at professionals and agencies for whom a couple grand is nothing in the grand scheme of things. Why would a hobbyist *need* a global sensor body that shoots 120fps?
Sony pioneered stacked sensors in still cameras and is now pioneering the global sensor. As far as getting the new tech into cameras there is no such thing as zero research cost. I'm no expert, but I imagine implementing things like faster sensor readouts and better AF etc. requires new processors, new internal circuitry, new internal mechanical designs, new firmware, etc. that all no doubt require considerable R&D resources. It's not like you can just magically drop new tech into an existing body with no additional cost or design changes.
|