artsupreme Online Upload & Sell: On
|
rscheffler wrote:
Agreed, on paper it all looks amazing. I'm guessing it will mostly translate to real world capabilities, too. The 300 is amazingly lightweight at basically half the weight of the original EF 300/2.8 from the '80s. But I can't help feel Sony slightly missed the boat by making it a prime lens. Maybe it's so it can be as small and light as possible. However, from my somewhat sports-centric perspective at least, if given the choice, I will never go back to fast prime super-tele lenses if equivalent (speed and image quality) zooms are available. Especially with 'low' resolution ~24MP FF sensors. In this respect I feel Canon got it right with the 100-300/2.8 and the hopefully soon to be released rumored 200-500/4. Canon's 200-400 was a significant reason I stuck with them since Sony's original a9 release in ~2017... and ~6 years later, still nothing like it from Sony. Kind of surprised, TBH.
As for the R1... Canon has a smaller global shutter sensor option for the C700 cine camera. And last December apparently released a couple full frame global shutter sensors for industrial applications. Those were only 19MP and 12-bit readout.
Between Nikon's 'cheap' and high-res Z8 stacked sensor, Sony's similar stacked sensor options, and now this global shutter premiere in mirrorless, Canon again have a bit of catching up to do. Maybe good reasons why the R5 has not yet been replaced and the rumored R1 still hasn't landed. Hopefully Canon will be able to deliver...!...Show more →
I don't mind the fact that the Sony is not a zoom given it's featherweight. I've been shooting with a 300 2.8 for 20+ years and I've never felt like I missed the shot because it was not a zoom. Especially during the last 10 years when AF and fps kept improving on modern cameras. My canon 300's have always been some of my favorite primes for shooting sports and motocross. I would not hesitate to continue using a 300 prime moving forward, especially at that weight. The 300's nowadays are swiss army knives giving you 3 lenses in one with the TC's. I bought the RF 100-300 and it's great, but it doesn't make a lightweight 300 obsolete IMO. The Sony is much lighter and $3500 cheaper, so it's still a great value for it's size, weight, and performance.
|