lumenspixel Online Upload & Sell: Off
|
j.liam wrote:
Did the the re-formulation effect the performance at non-macro distances? Your images are beautiful in their composition and the technical performance of the optic. The Leica version isn’t held in particularly high esteem.
Thank you for the nice words.
I have not compared the three versions but you could find on the web some information about them. The consensus is that the second and third versions would be the best ones, specially in the corners of a full frame camera.
You could for example peruse this thread: http://forum.mflenses.com/minolta-md-3-5-35-70mm-comparing-the-three-versions-t82636.html
Some of the Leica R/Minolta lenses are belittled because Leica purists could not accept the fact that their preferred manufacturer has unallied with a so perceived lowly Japanese manufacturer. But if you just look at the output, Minolta lenses were certainly not worse than those of the best manufacturers of the time and some of them certainly deserved the red label, such as for example the 16 mm fisheye still sold as Sony decades after its introduction in 1968.
|