bjhurley Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
It's amazing how popular film has become again, although I think it's regional. It's extremely fashionable in France among young people, and many of the young French immigrants where I live (Montréal) have film cameras. We have a few labs in town, but the most hip one (Studio Argentique) sometimes has lines out the door and they occasionally have to close shop for a couple of days so they can focus on processing their backlog and stop accepting new rolls.
I got back into film myself this year and after an initial period of "meh, why did I bother" I am now hooked. My main reservations about it are the environmental impacts. People will claim that a single digital camera has a higher impact than buying an old film camera and shooting hundreds or thousands of rolls, but if you already have a digital camera then every roll you shoot represents an avoidable impact. It's not just impacts of the chemicals used to develop film, it's all the materials and chemicals used to manufacture film, the fuel use and emissions resulting from transporting and distributing it to wherever you buy your film, and the physical waste of cannisters and negatives.
I still haven't seen a rigorous, objective lifecycle analysis of the environmental impacts of film, but it's like cars: you can buy a used car but the overwhelming lifetime impacts of a car are not in its manufacture but in the fuel used to run it. It's likely the same for film: my film cameras were made in the 1950s-1970s so their manufacturing impact is long over, but every roll of film I put in them has an impact. There are ways to minimize those impacts in terms of the processing chemicals used, but no way to avoid the manufacturing impacts (unless you only shoot old expired film and never buy new stock).
But I love shooting film and I mostly love the results, so I keep doing it. I'm just careful and I don't shoot a lot compared with digital.
|