1bwana1 Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
tschopp wrote:
To a large extent the need for camera and lens support updates is a self created problem by the software makers. Does anyone think the RAW file from an a6700 is any different than the raw file of a a7rv in crop mode, other than the camera EXIF data? Or the C7II and C7R files are different than the a7iv or a7rv files? At least they are not breaking JPG support based on EXIF data. When a new format is introduced like lossless compressed, then yes a software update is truly needed.
The subscription model disincentives competition. Essentially you have agreed to fund future development, but there is no agreement on what they should work on, or that they need to work on anything that is actually new. If you decide to stop funding the development then you lose all rights to the work you funded.
I understand how the model is great for the business, it stabilizes revenue and makes it highly predictable. This creates a stable workforce that is properly sized and people can focus on making software. Long term if they slack off or can't stay relevant they will lose market share, so there is a small element of competition still in place. ...Show more →
The amazing number, quality, usefulness, and technical advancement of the Adobe Creative Cloud suite of tools demonstrates that the subscription model doesn't inhibit competition and advancement. In fact, it appears to enable innovation at a rate the perpetual license model never achieved. The competition seems to be falling further and further behind in these features.
If you look at Adobe's latest financial reports it is apparent that the subscription model is a powerful financial multiplier for the company. Thus far they have leveraged this to return great value for the user base, the employees, and the shareholder. Good corporate governance demonstrated. I wish public governance would perform even close to this.
Edited on Sep 17, 2023 at 11:33 AM · View previous versions
|