chez Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.1 #8 · p.1 #8 · Sony: a stacked-sensor camera w/ hi-rez, moderate-size/price | |
chiron wrote:
The main deficit for me in almost all of Sony's cameras is that they lack a really good way of dealing with the LED lighting that is rapidly becoming universal. If one wants to shoot in electronic silent shutter mode, as I do virtually all the time, then the slow read-out times of non-stacked sensors produce banding under LED lights and also produce the related problem of rolling shutter and the distortion of fast movements.
A stacked sensor with a fast read-out eliminates both of these problems almost all of the time. With my A1 and my A9, both with stacked sensors and fast read-out, I personally never have had banding despite shooting constantly under LED lights. But the A9 is relatively lower rez these days and the A1 is quite expensive and I never have needed its sports and BIF features that add to its price.
I find the variable shutter solution that is implemented in the new A7Cxx bodies and in the A7RV to be a kludgy and incomplete solution that requires too much attention and compromise (e.g., can't use aperture priority mode) and is prone to a failure to prevent banding.
The stacked sensor is an expensive sensor to make, and increasing its resolution adds to the cost. But it should be possible to get up to about 40 or 42 mpix with a stacked sensor without breaking the bank.
The upcoming A93 and A2 will certainly be stacked sensor. But the A93 is likely to be lower rez and still expensive and the A2 will again be a very expensive camera.
It would be a breakthrough if Sony could make a camera in the mold and the moderate size of the A7R3 with a stacked sensor and no more than $4k in price.
If they had put a stacked sensor in one or both of the new A7Cxx cameras and added a couple of hundred to the price, those cameras would be perfect and fabulous....Show more →
Why doesn’t your A9 handle the times you need to shoot under led lights. Surely the resolution of the A9 should be fine for events no?
|