ruthenium Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
I extensively used PhotoMechanic on the Windows laptop, thus this app was among the first installed on the recently added MacBook Pro. However, I find that my culling changed on this Mac, and in practice I stopped using PhotoMechanic on the new laptop. I can explain my reasons, although they are probably not typical. In general, there are three major ways of culling:
1) by viewing the raw images, rendered in an app,
2) by viewing the jpgs embedded in the raw files,
3) by viewing jpgs exported from raw in an app
In the first, the raw files rendered by an app may not look representative of the fully corrected images. In the second, the jpgs can be too small for examining image details, although my A1 does embed full-sized jpgs in the raw files thus this hasn't been a problem to me, and allowed the use of PhotoMechanic.
The third option is my current preference, as the jpgs approach the final quality of fully corrected images.
Of course, this last option requires applying some default profile and exporting from an app, and it makes practical sense only if exporting wouldn't take too long.
On this new 16" MacBook Pro M2 Max 64GB laptop, exporting a 50MP Sony A1 raw to jpg takes 5 s in DxO PL6 (with DeepPRIME denoising as part of a custom profile) or 15 s with DeepPRIME XD. Thus, exporting 100 raw images takes 8 - 9 min with DeepPRIME or 25 min with DeepPRIME XD. I rarely need to cull more than 500 images in a single session. Thus, the approach I adopted on the new laptop is to export the images to jpg and cull the jpgs. In this scenario, apps like FastStone, or this new to me ApolloOne, I find more convenient than PhotoMechanic. Naturally, all of the above is just about personal preferences and by no means I suggest that there are no better alternatives. We all have different needs and preferences.
|