Daran Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.1 #8 · p.1 #8 · A1 BIF compressed raw required for 30fps- worth it? | |
QuietOC wrote:
There is no reason that delta encoding should cause visible posterization except through improper reconstruction--i.e., erroneous software that treats the decoded data as if it wasn't delta encoded.
That is incorrect.
In high contrast scenarios (night time photography or shooting against the sun) the encoding has to encompass the highest intensity of each short (16 pixel?) horizontal strip. The available delta offsets are a small set of coarse fractions of that offset, that are relative to that highest intensity. As long as all pixels are roughly similar in intensity (say factor 4), that is not a big issue. But if there are dark pixels right next to the high intensity, the encoding error can be quite big compared to the small intensity number to be encoded.
In practice this means that if you have e.g. road lights in a nightscape, there will be a narrow band of pixels just left and right to those lights, that are visibly noisy, distinctly different from areas those further away. Depending on circumstances (and the lens) those may or may not be overpowered by glare. Unlike glare and lens flares, the effect is always exactly horizontal.
None of that matters for BIF, though. I also shoot my stationary birds using compressed RAWs. The only birding scenario where I'd even consider not using compressed RAWs would be shooting birds against the sun, which I usually try to avoid.
|