BrightTiger Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
As an owner of a 61MP unit, the real-world primary advantages can be summarized as follows:
Large print images (gallery, prosumer work, or otherwise) are great (30" @ 300 dpi, 36" @ 250, etc) and seldom need significant enlargement, barring extreme dimensions. And even then, you have the pixels to do that without the image falling apart or AI artifacts.
Extra cropping room. Putting aside the "purists", having room for editing is huge. Life is not perfect.
Having the pixels to overwhelm ISO noise is huge. Couple this with LR and Topaz is amazing.
For personal shots (e.g., family daily life) I do drop the resolution down or just use the phone.
In short, needs determine solutions.
BUT I do caution that high resolution is not as important with the advancement of tools like LR and Topaz. Unless you have an absolute demand for no more than lightly-processed, wide dimensions photos, take a serious look at the 30-ish mp camera line and invest in the tools and how to use them.
ADDENDUM: Off on a another tangent last night looking at the Fuji TX-1 panorama film camera, I discovered another use: it effectivwly replaces that camera (and the costly and bothersome film). At a rough 5.6K pixel resoluton for film (see https://www.filmfix.com/blog.asp?post=599#:~:text=Thirty%2Dfive%2Dmillimeter%20film%20has,depends%20on%20its%20%E2%80%9Cgrain%E2%80%9D. - I'm not arguing over minutiae) and 65mmx24mm film dimensions, an A7R IV covers 97% of the width, without enlargement. Not bad at all!
|