RoamingScott Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Everyone has their own set of expectations of what constitutes expected IQ out of their systems. I think the photos on the top of the previous page are a great example of what I'm talking about though. Nothing about them indicates they were taken with a cutting edge 100mp medium format camera, as almost all of the detail has been lost, either through processing, downsizing, whatever.
The idea of "downsizing for web" is a thing of the past IMO. We're trying to view people's work on 5K monitors, posting the full resolution jpeg and letting FM size it for the width of the viewer's monitor is the best thing you can do to display it at max quality for each user.
As someone trying to judge the merit of a camera (in this case the 100S), it's nearly impossible to do when examples are posted that look like they could be from a m4/3 camera. This seems to be a common theme on the GFX image threads, and I'm trying to suss out why that is. For now, it most certainly seems to be a result of the post processing methods being utilized, as I'm not seeing the same output when using my standard post workflow on the RAW files.
|