PureMichigan Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
p.1 #6 · p.1 #6 · Best "big glass" focal length for football? | |
FWIW, I have two Z9s and a D5, which I now use as my remote. No low-light issues with a Z9 that I would consider in any way problematic. Further, the new Lightroom Denoise (introduced in the past few weeks) is sensational. Except in extraordinary situations, noise just isn't a practical consideration for me in any of my work for the media, colleges or pro teams. If people are making huge prints, well, maybe.
One major change noted elsewhere is the sensational performance of the new Z Series TCs. The loss is absolutely minimal compared to what we came to expect with the F-Mount, I would challenge anyone taking sports pictures to be able to tell the difference with Z-Prime with a 1.4. Add to this the additional crop flexibility from the larger files, and "reach" has never been so cheap, easy and effective. Buy unfortunately you can't pair the new TCs with F-Mount glass.
The OPs only real "problem" here is that the two the lenses that are probably the best fit (300MM 2.8/ 120- aren't yet available in Z - or even on the roadmap.
Based on what is noted, if I were in the OPs position and had to use F-Mount glass, I'd get the Nikon F-120-300MM 2.8 (used!) with an FTZ. Not sure of the compatibility of the Sigma version.
All of that said, you may be the first football photographer I've met to say that 400MM might be too much! Usually the complaint goes in the other direction, but that is likely shooting style issue and we are all different in that respect. For most who shoot football 60% of the time (as OP noted above) that 400MM is the meal ticket if you have the means.
|