chiron Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
p.2 #13 · p.2 #13 · Completing a travel kit Sony 85mm 1.8 vs Sigma 90 2.8 | |
SpecFoto wrote:
Yes....But...... 
Mark did take the Sigma 90 on this trip to India and gave it high priase...but upon his return he made a new video on smaller lenses he would like Sony to make and a 90 f2.8 was one of them. So he would replace the proven Sigma with the new Sony.....Sounds like an Ambassador here.....
He does love his Batis 135mm f2.8 though, I remember him saying so a few years ago in a video where he was discussing the new Sony 135GM. He basically said that even though Batis was made for Sony, they did not like him talking about it anymore as they had the new 135GM out. But he still does mention the Batis 135 from time to time, so it seems he is threading a line. Anyway, I still think he is one of the best Sony references out there, Ambassador status or not. ...Show more →
I think you are trying way too hard to make an argument that is critical of Mark. In the video, he praises the Sigma i series 90/2.8 up and down the street and takes it on two trips, right in the face of the Sony 85/1.8 which he owns but doesn't take. His telling Sony that they should make a small 90/2.8 is not somehow favoring Sony, which is what you say. If anything, it emphasizes that Sigma has something desirable (a small 90/2.8) that Sony does not. How is that shilling for Sony? Sony still doesn't have such a lens.
I do wish Sony would stop flirting with an array of small lenses (like the three G 2.8/2.5 lenses) and get busy releasing more of them. Maybe their commitment to a small body/high performance camera in the new A7Cxx series is a sign of commitment to small.
|