rscheffler Online Upload & Sell: Off
|
Question in my mind: if it spans 1-2x magnification, what will be the image quality hit by the additional optics in the light path at 1x? Is there a free lunch here to keep the TC attached at all times without optical compromises? It just doesn't seem logical for this to be true.
Down the road when Canon finally has a pro level APS-C body, how about a 0.625-1.25x speedbooster/TC combo? This way the 100-300 and 200-500 can be used at FF equivalent fields of view of 100-300 to 200-600 and 200-500 to 400-1000 respectively on APS-C. If more reach is needed, then use this 1-2x, or the traditional 1.4 and 2x TCs.
Maybe I should patent this ASAP! 
Additionally, I feel like the zoom TC idea would be much more usable if the TC's zoom was motor driven. For example, you could assign turning the control ring to 'zoom' the TC, or assign a dial on the camera. From my experience with the 200-400, one thing I don't like about the internal TC design is that it's necessary to physically move my left hand off the zoom ring to flip the TC in and out. I would have loved a servo-driven actuator instead, where pressing a button, such as those on the lens, would flip it in and out instead. Way faster but of course more complicated and more expensive. I believe Nikon put the TC lever for their 180-400 on the right side so it's at least possible to move with a couple fingers gripping the camera (by the looks of it - I have never tried it nor have I looked into whether it's possible).
|