Choderboy Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
EB-1 wrote:
I've always wondered about the side tilt angle needed to maintain balance on the Wimberley MH-100. Would you say that a 500/4 +1.4x TC with a monopod on a semi-slippery surface would be better with an RRS MH-01 (fore-aft only monopod) head rather than the MH-100 or vice versa? I'm not in particularly good shape and I normally use a tripod rather than a monopod.
EBH
When the MH-100 was released, there were many people who thought the side tilt issue was a deal breaker.
Call me gullible, but I wondered if it mattered. The fact it is a Wimberley product led me to think that it likely did not matter.
So I ordered one and immediately loved it. No fighting the stick for me. I just use it. I quickly learned to pay no attention to any angle of the stick. I just handhold camera and lens like I'm handholding, except theres no effort fighting gravity. I can't remember which reviewer at release stated "just forget about the side thing, you don't need to think about it". (Or words to that effect). That has proven accurate for me. I use Sigma 500 f4 and Sony 200-600.
When I was using a tilt head, for any subject I was going to spend anytime shooting, I would tighten the head and the tripod collar was only loosened to switch between landscape and vertical orientation. With the MH-100, everything is loose except for when carrying in me 'rough terrain' configuration, as per photo I posted above.
For the money, before using it, it does not seem like good value. After using it, it does.
By reading opinions of users of the MH-100, "by far the best" or similar is a common statement.
So clearly, for those, the 'side thing' is a non issue.
No guaruntee you will be one of the non issue people, but it's a big club.
|