lightskyland Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
Steve Spencer wrote:
Sorry, for me the Z8 plus the 400 f/4.5S plus the 1.4X TC I am pretty sure I will much prefer over my current A1 plus 200-600.
Let's look at weight and size. The Nikon combo is 2290g (that is camera, plus TC, plus lens) and the front of the lens is just 253mm from the lens mount. My A1 plus 200-600 G combo is 2852g (that is well over a 500g heavier) and it is 318mm from the lens mount (or 65mm longer). So the Nikon system is clearly a lot lighter and smaller now that there is a Z8.
Let's talk price (these are new prices from B & H).
The Nikon system is $3999 for the camera, $3,000 for the lens and $547 for the TC that is a total cost of $7,546 for the system.
The Sony system is $6,498 for the camera, and $1,898 (on sale right now) for the lens for a total cost of $8,396 for the system.
So the Nikon system is lighter, smaller, and cheaper. It also at 400mm has a stop faster aperture and if you look on the Nikon board can produce some pretty stellar images.
For me and what I shoot it isn't even close. I prefer the Nikon system here. Of course YMMV....Show more →
For me, if I want top IQ while birding I use a 400/2.8 or 600/4 with or w/o TC (depending on subject distance).
If I am trying to track BIF with something difficult, I use a 100-400 or 200-600, because trying to track a swift or swallow with a prime is almost impossible. So there's not really any room for a lighter-weight slower prime telephoto lens in my kit.
Similar for landscape - I prefer a 100-400 or 200-600 when doing isolation landscape images, because I can zoom to compose the image.
|